The Aivius GEO Knowledge Framework: 12 Layers From Discovery to Growth
A constraint map connecting crawlability, retrieval, evidence, citation, recommendation, buyer action, and repeat measurement.
Practical frameworks, official-source analysis, and original evidence for turning AI search gaps into prioritized, testable growth work.
START WITH YOUR JOB
Each path serves a different intent. Start with the task you need to complete rather than reading in publication order.
A constraint map connecting crawlability, retrieval, evidence, citation, recommendation, buyer action, and repeat measurement.
Why eligibility, retrieval, evidence use, and visible citation are different states—and how to audit the stage that failed.
A brand can be named without being endorsed, recommended without being cited, or absent while its website is used as a source. Learn how to measure each signal without inflating your score.
One answer is an anecdote, not a benchmark. Build a repeatable test with balanced prompts, repeated observations, complete metadata, and honest confidence labels.
GEO improves the eligibility, clarity, and evidence of content used in AI-assisted discovery. This guide explains what can be controlled, what must be tested, and how GEO complements SEO.
A practical method for checking AI-search statistics: source class, denominator, collection date, engine scope, failures, and limits on what the number proves.
Verify OAI-SearchBot access, build evidence for buyer questions, and measure citations separately from mentions, visits, and qualified demand.
Use Search eligibility, non-commodity evidence, repeated observations, and conversion data—without relying on invented AI ranking tactics.
Learn what the proposed llms.txt convention does, how it differs from robots.txt, which support claims can be verified, and when it is not the highest-priority technical fix.
Review dated evidence about Reddit citations, identify category-specific source patterns, and participate in relevant communities without manufacturing mentions or spam.
Start with a directional snapshot, then investigate the evidence gaps worth acting on.
COMPLETE LIBRARY
Evidence-led frameworks for technical eligibility, prompt research, content operations, measurement, and revenue attribution.
Map discovery, comparison, recommendation, validation, and conversion in AI-assisted buying journeys, then measure each stage without inventing attribution.
Build a defensible AI search attribution model with referral data, UTMs, landing-page events, CRM outcomes, and explicit limits on causal claims.
Audit which sources appear in AI answers, separate observed citations from assumptions, and prioritize ethical, relevant third-party evidence.
Coordinate content, SEO, product, engineering, PR, and analytics with clear GEO owners, review gates, service levels, and shared outcome metrics.
Evaluate GEO candidates across search fundamentals, research judgment, technical fluency, evidence quality, analytics, and cross-team execution.
Apply Google’s current Search guidance to AI Mode, improve eligibility and usefulness, and run controlled tests across visibility, clicks, and conversions.
Build, classify, and test decision-stage AI prompts using an auditable framework that keeps observed visibility separate from revenue attribution.
Design a practical GEO operating model with clear roles, editorial review, technical SEO, measurement, and a repeatable weekly execution cadence.
Connect AI search observations to qualified visits, leads, paid audits, and revenue with a staged funnel that avoids false attribution claims.
Compare SEO and GEO without false tradeoffs: preserve crawlability and helpful content, then add prompt research, citation testing, and outcome measurement.
SEO remains foundational for AI search, but rankings alone do not measure retrieval, citation, recommendation, or conversion. Use a staged diagnostic instead.